History knows many examples of prophecies that came true exactly. For example, Nostradamus predicted the revolution of 1917 several centuries ago, and the great predictor who saw through time, Wolf Messing, warned Germany about the Second World War, in turn, Vanga described in detail the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001 in the United States.
People with the gift of prophecy are one of the most interesting and inexplicable mysteries of humanity. Who are they?
Since ancient times, the future has worried and worried people. In search of answers to many questions, people turned with hope to shamans and astrologers, who, with varying degrees of success, predicted the future, and sometimes simply deceived. Prophets were revered and feared at all times; they were close to the rulers who made history and ruled the world.
Has the gift of prophecy always brought happiness to its owners? After all, this gift is quite heavy in that the seers accumulate quite a huge amount of information in their consciousness. They feel people's emotions, their pain and all kinds of experiences. By letting all this pass through themselves, seers cause irreparable harm to their health.
In the 7th century BC in Greece, a thousand people, in a long line, skirting gorges, climbed to the temple on the rocky slope of Parnassus. They overcame this difficult path to find out your future from the gods. Here, at an altitude of 700 meters, stood a temple of unprecedented beauty, in the center of which was an altar - the Oracle. Historians believe that in this place underground gases evaporated from the ground, after inhaling which the priestesses of the temple made their predictions. In this way they put themselves into a trance. No one will know for sure whether they were under the influence of drugs or whether they actually communicated with higher powers.
An even more exotic form of foresight flourished in ancient Rome. There was a college of augurs there. These are priests who predict the future based on the flight path, cry and behavior of birds. Roman troops on military campaigns always took with them a wagon of chickens, which were used for predictions.
Kings and kings of all times and peoples had court sorcerers and astrologers all their lives, whose words they listened to.
The weather was the first thing that magicians learned to predict, but that was not enough. They wanted to know more about life and destiny. The future was both alarming and alluring. I wanted to tame him, like a wild animal, so as not to be afraid.
In 1933, mathematician Andrei Kalmogorov presented his theory of probability to the world. He proved that even seemingly random processes have their own patterns that can be calculated and predicted the future.
This begs the question: is prediction really the ability to clearly see the future? Or maybe you can not have any abilities, but simply be a psychologist and analyst, and using probability theory to predict the future?
In 2012, scientists from the University of California proved that the gift of foresight really exists. They showed a group of people several unpleasant photographs with images of pieces of meat, scary grimaces and other images of negative content. The devices recorded that a few seconds before the photograph appeared, the subjects' heartbeats increased. Scientists called this phenomenon the premonition effect.
One of the methods of prediction is palmistry. Palmistry is one of the oldest ways of predicting the future. This is a prediction by hand. This method is considered one of the most accurate. Using your left hand you can predict a person’s fate, his past, and using the lines of your right hand you can predict the future. Every person has lines on their palms, and each of them has a characteristic meaning.
But what to do if you want to know the future, but don’t have the money or time to go to a psychic? You can try the most common folk fortune telling using matches. The main thing before the ceremony begins is to formulate the question in such a way that the answer is monosyllabic. Either yes or no. You need to light a match and throw it into the water. If the match floats on the surface, the answer is yes. If she drowned, then the answer is no. If coals float from a match, this means that there will be a lot of obstacles on the way to the goal. If the match sank head down, but did not sink to the bottom, this means that the person is not ready to find out the answer to his question.
You can also predict the future using water and wax. In this way you can predict the fate of a love relationship. To do this, you will need 2 candles and, using a needle or knife, you need to write the first letter of your name on one candle, and the name of your chosen one on the other. Then you need to light the candles and drip wax into the water. Then again you need to take matches, think about your chosen one and throw it into the water, then a second match and repeat the same thing. Next you need to look at the drawing made from wax. Matches are in in this case may lie differently. For example, if they are intertwined, then this means a strong union; if the matches drown, then the union is doomed. However, the interpretation of wax figures is different for everyone and everyone understands them in their own way.
Along with the above, it should be noted interesting fact: Scientists have developed a sensational theory that the phenomenon of foreseeing the future is inherent in every person. Therefore, it is better not to guess with matches, wax or anything else. It would be more correct to study your own thinking, because the brain is a matrix that is filled with various information flows. People live in three-dimensional time space and constantly perceive and learn information. The information that a person receives goes into the past, and the information that he perceives is in the future. In this way a person can build his life in a simple way– analyzing the past.
Researchers claim that foresight is an innate talent of human consciousness that people have lost. But it can be developed. It is only important to learn to listen to intuition, analyze current events and attach meaning to dreams. And yet, psychologists advise not to get carried away with fortune-telling, but to live for today. After all, it is today that shapes tomorrow.
Is it possible to foresee the future? What does this give to a person and society? Being an integral element of the connection of times, the category of the future is included in the structure of historical consciousness; Without the future, without confidence in it, there can be no healthy historical consciousness.
The matter, however, is not only a matter of the state of historical consciousness: the attempt to lift the veil over the future is of vital importance both for the individual and for society. In both cases there is no gap between the present and the future. When making plans for the future, an individual starts from the present, regardless of whether and to what extent he wants to transfer something from the present to his subsequent life. When conceiving reforms and transformations, society, one way or another, must take into account their possible consequences. In this sense, taking perspective into account has socio-practical significance. Attempts at foresight can differ both in the length of the perspective - distant or immediate, and in scale (where history is going, where the country is going or what awaits it in the near future as a result of certain changes, reforms in the present). In all cases, it is important to understand how this should be done, what is the mechanism of thinking aimed at unraveling a possible perspective.
In this regard, it is necessary, first of all, to distinguish between two methods of predicting the future. They differ both terminologically and in meaning. Is this a prediction or prophecy, And foresight. Prediction lies outside the realm of science, rational Thinking, foresight is scientific in nature. The most famous prophet was the French doctor, the most educated man of his time, M. Nostradamus(1503-1566). His realized prophecies include the French Revolution of 1789-1794, two world wars, the war in Afghanistan, etc. However, the attitude towards the predictions of M. Nostradamus was and remains ambiguous, to the point of doubting their reliability and even denying it. The reason for this is given to you by the soothsayer: his quatrains (quatrains) often do not lend themselves to unambiguous interpretation. The most important thing is that the mechanism, the logic of the predictions of M. Nostradamus still cannot be deciphered, their secret remains unsolved.
A famous magical soothsayer was also Vanga, who lived in Bulgaria in the 20th century. Vanga predicted the defeat of A. Hitler; in World War II, the collapse of the kingdom of the Bulgarian Tsar Boris, the entry of Soviet troops into Czechoslovakia in 1968, etc. Regarding her prophecies, the question remains open: “What should be treated as a real, proven historical fact?” This question applies not only to prophecy itself, but also to the method of divination; however, in the latter case, the demand for a rationalistic decoding is hardly legitimate, since we are talking about magic.
Unlike prophecy, the mechanism of scientific foresight should not be a metaphysical secret: when looking to the future, the historian cannot remain ignorant of the logic and structure of thinking, otherwise he will have nothing to say about the probable future. What is this logic? Its understanding is facilitated by the study of real facts of foreseeing the future. German historian of the 19th century, expert on the history of Ancient Rome T. Mommsen(1817 -1903) left a will, which was to be opened fifty years after his death. T. Mommsen died in 1903, in 1953 the will was opened and caused a lot of noise in Germany. From behind the gravestone, the scientist told his descendants that he did not believe in the strength of the German Reich created in 1871 and predicted its collapse in the near future. During the November Revolution of 1918 in Germany, this prediction became a fact.
What did T. Mommsen rely on in his forecast? From his will we learn practically nothing about this except his sharp negative attitude towards the Hohenzollern dynasty. However, even during his lifetime, being an ardent and sincere supporter of the unification of Germany, T. Mommsen, in his own way, using the means of a historian available to him, sought to help the unification of the country, referring to the past. The scientist wrote about the law of movement of any nation towards the creation of a single state, considered the conquest of Italy by Ancient Rome as a type of such unification, and even found in this distant past a model for Germany - the democratic, as it seemed to him, monarchy of Caesar. With the formation of the Bismarckian Reich, T. Mommsen had to endure a rather sensitive disappointment about this: the German Empire did not in any way resemble a democratic one, and the historian moved into the category of opponents and even opponents of O. Bismarck. T. Mommsen's forecast is connected with this disappointment. In his forecast, the historian relied on the past and the contemporary environment. Even if we admit that relying on the past is not convincing (the dictatorship of Caesar, by its social essence, could not become a prototype for Germany), one cannot but agree with the reality of another: the conservative nature of the Hohenzollern empire became one of the reasons for its collapse.
There are known facts about the prediction of the First World War by F. Engels (1820-1895) and O. Bismarck, and the latter associated its beginning with the crisis situation in the Balkans. The analysis of emerging contradictions, the formation of opposing sides to the conflict, a contemporary of which was O. Bismarck, helped him make this forecast. The rest of the politician’s thinking mechanism cannot be deciphered due to the individuality of the situation and the thinking of O. Bismarck, who did not give explanations on this matter that were so necessary to penetrate the secret of this mechanism.
And here is what F. Engels saw in the future: “...for Prussia-Germany, no other war is now possible except a world war. And it would be a worldwide war of unprecedented size, unprecedented strength. From eight to ten million soldiers will strangle each other and at the same time devour the whole of Europe to such an extent that clouds of locusts have never been eaten clean. The devastation caused by the Thirty Years' War, compressed into three or four years and spread over the entire continent, famine, epidemics, the general savagery of both the troops and the people, caused by acute need, the hopeless confusion of our artificial mechanism of trade, industry and credit ; all this ends in general bankruptcy; the collapse of the old states and their routine statesmanship - such a collapse that dozens of crowns are lying on the pavement and there is no one to pick up these crowns; the absolute impossibility of foreseeing how it will all end and who will emerge victorious from the struggle; only one result is absolutely certain: general exhaustion and the creation of conditions for the final victory of the working class.” This was written in 1887. Amazing accuracy in some details, although this cannot be required of a forecast of any order. From individual statements of F. Engels accompanying the forecast, it follows that the proposed world war will be the result of long-term trends in the development of Germany and Europe: “This is where, gentlemen, kings and statesmen, your wisdom has led old Europe.” Behind this lies a generalization of an even higher order, associated with the level and quality of general historical ideas, the level of theory: war is a product of the logic of the development of capitalist relations, which inevitably leads to the final victory of the working class. There was no victory then, but the First World War had the most direct and immediate relation to the victory of the October Socialist Revolution of 1917. F. Engels’ forecast was made, so to speak, incidentally, about an event that did not correlate in its significance with the scale of the predicted phenomenon, that in this case, it does not contribute to deciphering the structure of thinking that gave rise to the forecast in question.
Let's give another example of a realized forecast. In July 1917, G.V. Plekhanov (1856-1918) published an appeal to the ruling elite of Russia in the newspaper Unity.
And about one more forecast. In 1902, in one of his letters, M. Gorky wrote: “The old man Klyuchevsky said the other day: “Since I know Russian history and history in general, I can unmistakably say that we are present in the agony of autocracy.” The writer said about Nicholas II: “This is the last tsar, Alexei will not reign.” And here there is no author’s transcript of the forecast, except for a reference to knowledge of Russian history. V.O. Klyuchevsky aphoristically briefly and accurately expressed the essence of the problem of forecasting: to look into the future, you need to look back. However, even I.V. Goethe (1749-1832) called the historian “a prophet who predicts backwards.” A historian, indeed, can be called a prophet, relying on the past and, let us add, on contemporary events. The larger the events, the more important it is to look back in search of their roots, origins, and, consequently, possible consequences. The origins and course of events and processes, the logic of their development allow us to judge with some probability the possible outcome, the future. Is it possible, however, to specify the factor of relying on the past as a source and basis for forecasting? One of the modern authors, V. Kozhinov, tried to go further than V.O. Klyuchevsky on the issue of forecasting. He wrote: “The only method for properly understanding where we are going is to look back into history. There is no other method. Everything else is fortune telling on coffee grounds. In order to understand where we are going, we need to find a similar situation in the past and see what awaits us in the future.”
In fact, the specification of forecasting proposed by V. Kozhinov is not a rational option for developing the corresponding views of the great historian. It contradicts the fundamental feature of the phenomena of the social environment - their individual originality, which excludes their literal repetition and leads to different consequences even from very similar historical situations. It should be emphasized: a forecast is a look into the future, but the impulse for this comes from the current situation and is based on the past. Each link in the historical process is always very specific in its content and meaning, which makes the forecasting procedure equally specific and incompatible with any stereotypes of thinking.
In addition, two levels of forecasting should be noted: on the scale of specific events or processes and on the scale of history as a whole, since the question “Where is history going?” is not idle at all. Reliance on the past within the framework of history as a whole is just as necessary as in specific forecasting, but in this case an orderly approach to the past is important, which provides only one level of thinking - general historical theory. A rational version of such a theory links together an understanding of all links of the historical process - past, present and future - which already contains a certain idea of the logic of the movement of this process, and therefore the potential ability to draw a conclusion about its probably distant or not very distant by the standards of history future. The structure and content of the theory depend on the development of history, therefore, at this level of foresight there is no possibility of reducing the structure of thinking to some kind of stereotype that does not depend on the specific historical situation and the state of knowledge corresponding to it.
Cases confirming the reality of the phenomenon are not difficult to find. John Riley from the USA described how on September 11, 1981 he had a premonition. He was about to take a very early flight from Rochester, New York, to Chicago, then to Albuquerque, and finally to San Francisco. He got up before dawn and therefore fell asleep as soon as he sat down in his seat in the plane. At 5:40 a.m. he was woken up by a flight attendant who was serving breakfast. During those few minutes of sleep, Riley told the flight attendant and other passengers, he had an incredibly vivid dream, very similar to reality.
Riley dreamed of a helicopter falling like a stone from the sky onto the coastal expressway. Impressed by what he saw, Riley bought the latest editions of local newspapers at each airport along the route, but did not find any reports of any disaster. It was only when he reached San Francisco and was driving from the airport that the news broadcast was interrupted by a musical broadcast, it reported on a tragedy that had occurred nearby in Fremont. The announcer used almost the same words and images in which John Riley described the crash to his fellow passengers. The helicopter crash occurred six hours after it.
It is curious that when Riley subsequently saw the details of the disaster, they were slightly different from his dream. For example, the weather in reality was foggy. Apparently, in the dream, Riley visualized the crash based on his first encounter with radio news in the future of the moment that had the greatest emotional impact on him. Since this acquaintance occurred through a radio report, his dream was shaped by the words of the announcer, but Riley was forced to complete the details of the picture in his imagination. Thus, he saw the more general facts correctly in the dream, because the announcer described them, but there were errors in small details, since they were not mentioned in the radio report, and they had to be invented.
In another case, Arctic explorer Dr. Peter Wadhams described to SPR a dream he had on May 27, 1994. In the dream, he was in his childhood home, holding a double-barreled shotgun, and performing a series of actions. This vivid dream made a strong impression on Wadhams, but since he had never dealt with any guns, it all seemed rather strange to him. He had the dream just before he woke up at 7:20 am. An hour later, at breakfast, he saw a TV report about how the police seized weapons during a raid. The report included a scene with a police officer holding a double-barreled shotgun and performing the same actions as Peter Wadhams himself in his dream. It is likely that Wadhams somehow took the future scene from the television news and included it in a dream, as often happens.
The problem with these types of cases is that often the only evidence is the words of one person. But David Mundell, a London resident who experiences vivid and often prophetic dreams, has developed a simple way around this problem. He writes down all his dreams that seem prophetic to him, and draws sketches of the pictures seen in the dream, and then takes a photograph with this drawing in his hands in front of a bank building or other building on which there is a light board showing the exact date and time. Subsequently, he has the opportunity to present these photographs as proof that he actually foresaw the event.
Mundell often demonstrated his remarkable abilities. A classic example is a series of dreams in which he saw “four square lights” rising from parked cars and falling “into a river or onto a runway.” A photograph of him with sketches of dream images against the backdrop of a bank clock indicating the date of the upcoming event was even discussed in a television interview 24 hours before the predictions came true. The event that Mundell foresaw occurred on March 9, 1994, when members of the IRA (Irish Republican Army) fired four grenade launcher shots from cars parked near Heathrow Airport. Mines fell on the runway. This unexpected and one-of-a-kind terrorist attack matched David Mundell's drawing and description with incredible accuracy.
Lottery problem
A question that is often asked about people like Mundell is: If they have the ability to see so clearly, why don't they win the lottery by predicting the right numbers? 1995, summer - Dave Mandell was invited to television to participate in a program where this idea was tested. Mundell described some of his more stunning dreams, including one that led him to cancel his last-minute train ticket on the London-Swansea Express, which then crashed. He showed the audience a ticket, which had been replaced by a railway ticket office employee at his insistence. The experiment on “guessing lottery numbers” included all kinds of prediction methods: from fortune telling by numbers to fortune telling by Tarot cards. As a result, six numbers were selected and recorded. Unfortunately, none of the participants in the experiment achieved success. Only two out of six numbers were correct among the 7 drawn (out of 49 possible), which is slightly above the random level, but this is clearly not enough to win even the smallest prize.
The situation was somewhat better for Margaret Bramley from Darlington. Late one night, while going to bed, her husband heard her mumbling in her sleep, naming a series of numbers. He woke her up, and Margaret remembered that in her dream she had indicated additional numbers on the lottery ticket that they usually did not use. The Bramley couple decided to trust fate - and guessed 5 out of 6 possible numbers. As a result, they won a large amount of money.
Such examples teach us several things. First, attempts to force foresight are rarely successful. In the best possible way it works when it happens spontaneously. Secondly, it is almost certain that Margaret would not have remembered what she had dreamed in the morning: this happened only because her husband woke her up in time. Third, Margaret Brumley saw the immediate impending event of her life—the filling of new squares on a lottery ticket—rather than what might be considered the more emotionally impactful moment of receiving the winnings, when the guessed numbers were confirmed. But the moment of winning was several days away from filling out the ticket, which probably played a role during the dream: Margaret preferred a less vivid, but closer in time event.
Does this give reason to believe that the ability to foresee the future increases as the future event approaches? The research appears to support this conclusion. Several experiments have shown that more than 90% of successful predictions are fulfilled within 48 hours, and less than 3% relate to events more than two weeks away from the moment of prediction. More than half of the predictions come true within a day. Researcher Alan Vaughan from America and British psychic Dana Zohar convincingly proved this with a detailed statistical test.
Foresight and memory
1993 - Vaughan and Jack Hawke reported in SPR another experiment showing that precognition acts like memory in reverse. Recent events are remembered well, but the quality of memories quickly decreases as time moves away from the event.
Memory studies conducted by psychologists provide an opportunity to shed additional light on the phenomenon of foresight. Emotionally charged events leave particularly vivid memories and are remembered much better even after many years, in contrast to ordinary incidents that do not evoke strong emotions. It is well known, for example, that many people who were over 10 years old in November 1963 can remember absolutely clearly the moment when they heard about the assassination of American President John Kennedy. But ask them what they were doing on any given day in November 1973, or even 1993, and very few will remember anything intelligible. Thus, the emotional coloring of the moment is superimposed on the memory and consolidates it.
Exactly the same effect can be observed in the case of precognition: emotionally charged events give rise to more visions and “cast a shadow” from the future further into the past than small everyday events. This is a clear confirmation that memory and precognition operate in a similar way, through the same mechanism in the human mind.
Dissociation
The review, which was published in 1993 in the Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, provides much food for thought. Two psychologists from Canada, Colin Ross and Sean Joshi, decided to find out whether the phenomenon of precognition is associated with such a well-known mental state as dissociation. They found that such a connection actually exists, and along the way they found that 17.8% of the population had experienced precognition at some point in their lives.
Dissociation is, in essence, the ability of a person to be distracted from the external world and concentrate more on his internal state, paying so much attention to the internal world that there is a danger of getting lost in it and even beginning to perceive it as reality. Of course, this does not mean that people experiencing dissociation are hallucinating. They are simply more capable of assimilating internal information, which is blocked in people who are primarily focused on the external world. Such information may seem not just an illusion, but valuable and meaningful information.
This is precisely the idea that follows from data collected by US parapsychologist William Cox. He analyzed the information about the trains that crashed and found that the number of passengers on such trains was significantly less than on other trains at the same time or on the same trains but on different days before the disaster. This can only be explained by the fact that people who had the ability to dissociate subconsciously sensed an impending disaster and decided to take another train or abandon the trip.
Ross and Joshi also noted a recent finding by psychologists that bystanders (especially survivors) were often abused as children. Skeptics are looking for ways to turn such impressive data into a means of “disproving” unusual phenomena. However, a study conducted in Canada did not find a direct link between child abuse and later experiences of mysterious phenomena. Rather, it can be argued that those who suffered abuse as children develop a good ability to live an internal life, seeking to escape from the everyday reality that causes trauma.
It is likely that such people acquire the ability to dissociate and pay more attention to what is happening in their inner world. Sometimes the price for this may be an increased tendency to fantasize, but with the same success a special sensitivity to foresight may develop. Other people, on the contrary, learn to ignore internal experiences, considering them “simply a play of the imagination.” Trust in your feelings is considered in modern society to be a much lesser virtue than the ability to think rationally. This suppression of a part of the personality creates an imbalance and can be very costly for some of us.
Deja vu, an incomprehensible trembling of the body, the hair on the back of our necks standing on end... People have always believed that our body has many ways to warn us that something is bound to happen. A lot has been said about prophetic dreams. But today scientists are trying to explore the possibility of predicting the near future in everyday life.
After conducting a huge amount of scientific research based on testing, some scientists confidently claim that the human body can still predict the future. After their research, these scientists began to assume with confidence that they had found evidence that a person can feel the approach of a certain event without any outside cues.
The article "Within Perception" in the journal Science reports that after studying people's reactions to twenty-six different tests, scientists found that the subjects were able to foresee something that went beyond the ordinary and was sure to happen in the near future.
Julia Mossbridge from Southeastern University in Illinois, Patrizio Tressoldi from Universidad di Padova in Italy, and Jessica Utts from the University of California are the researchers behind the test.
It involves showing a certain group of people a series of random photographs. Most of these photographs are neutral, the rest are aimed at stimulating the human subconscious. The devices detected the physiological disturbances of the subjects a few seconds before the event, what happened to them or photographs that touched their senses: acceleration of heart rate, increase in brain activity and blood volume. Scientists call this phenomenon the “premonition” effect.
People's reactions began to occur mainly ten seconds before something was supposed to happen, which became the basis for believing that the human body is still endowed with certain unusual abilities. This discovery suggests that the body of any person is capable of sensing the future at the subconscious level, but only if something important is about to happen in it. A person cannot predict minor everyday events.
Julia Mossbridge says that she, like her colleagues, do not consider this discovery to be some kind of supernatural phenomenon. “This is nothing more than an ordinary law of nature that simply has not been studied by scientists before.” Their opponents are skeptical about this discovery. Some scientists say that the test results offered by these researchers cannot be evidence that the so-called “hunger” effect exists at all. Others believe that such research results are quite possible, but they are random, which cannot be confirmation of a person’s ability to foresee the future.
We can only believe that our body still has extraordinary abilities, because the human brain is a depth that has never been explored in detail by anyone.
Yulia Ershova
Recently, Russian and American parapsychologists made a sensational discovery: the phenomenon of foreseeing the future is inherent in every person, so you should not look for the future in planets, maps, beans, coffee grounds and computers. We need to study our own consciousness. Scientific minds have developed information theory, which proves that predicting the future is an innate ability of the human brain, which humanity has unfortunately lost.
Parapsychologists, supporters of this theory, conducted numerous experiments in the field of consciousness and subconsciousness, and also studied in detail the religious, philosophical and historical works of different peoples: the Bible, the Koran, the Vedas, the Torah.
For example, parapsychologists believe that some provisions of the information theory are contained in the teachings of Zoroaster, the founder of the Zoroastrianism religion and a prophet who received information from the future.
Zarathushtra created a religion of worship of Good Thought, considering the Supreme God Ahura Mazda as the Lord of Thought. In his teachings, he explains how to work with internal information.
Briefly, the essence of modern information theory is explained as follows. The human brain is a matrix that is filled with various information codes. A person lives in a three-dimensional time flow and constantly receives and emits information.
The information it emits goes into the past, the information it receives comes from the future.
Information itself is nothing more than a connection between mental and physical body man, and man is its source and recipient.
Thus, since a person lives in a three-dimensional time flow, he is simultaneously in both the past and the future.
He sends information signals to himself from the future to the past, and vice versa.
A person can constantly model his future by changing his past, and he always has several variety of options his future.
Paradoxically, the main idea of information theory was accidentally revealed in the movie “The Butterfly Effect” even before this theory was heard in scientific circles and received recognition.
Research has shown that in order for a person to predict the future, it is necessary to experience a surge of intellectual or emotional activity: the information flow from the future manifests itself in creativity.
It is not surprising that it was writers and poets, artists and directors who often turned out to be prophets, accurately describing future inventions and disasters in their works.
Scientists explain it this way: objects of art, culture, and literature help to establish a connection with the future, because they are addressed to descendants, and the thoughts of descendants are addressed to works of art.
Spiritual communication arises between creators and viewers. People exchange thoughts.
For example, a writer writes his thoughts on paper. Descendants read them and reflect on the writer’s creation. The wind of time plucks their thoughts like old leaves and carries them into the past, where some of them end up with the writer. Hence the mysterious predictions.
But, of course, descendants turn their thoughts not to everyone, but to thinkers who left their mark on history.
Scientists say that modern stage development, a person can try to regain his lost ability.
With the help of special training, he can improve the “audibility” of the future, but for this he needs to learn how to form an information flow.
For this there is different ways: concentration, hypnosis, meditation, yoga. A long and painstaking understanding of the images transmitted to the past is necessary. Information about an event must be accompanied by a certain emotional mood, and for each person this mood is individual.
Recent studies prove that foretelling the future and telepathy are more common in children than in adults.
At birth, the human brain develops, not only obeying the laws of biological heredity, but also perceiving information from the future related to the person’s upcoming activities and his fate. The child’s brain prepares as best it can for the upcoming tests.
The diary of Moscow schoolboy Leva Fedorov, written shortly before the start of the Great Patriotic War, not only contains a fairly accurately indicated date for the start of the war, but also reveals the main meaning and content of the Barbarossa aggressive plan.
The presentation gives a brilliant detailed forecast of the future, shows the flawed and futile nature of this plan, and the inevitability of the collapse of German military aspirations.
Children's brains perceive information from the future more clearly, and as a result, children can get sick.
Few modern people can use telepathic abilities, but animals constantly use them in their lives.
In the book “Animal Training,” V. Durov spoke about the impact of mental commands on the behavior of animals. Through the wall, without seeing or hearing the man, the dog carried out his mental orders. And sometimes an entire program.
Telepathy is one of the most effective methods animal training.
To better understand the nature of predictions, telepathy and prophetic dreams, scientists in Russia, Europe and America are conducting thousands of studies and experiments to study the largest predictions of the past.
There are many cases where prophets predicted death or disaster, here are examples of several striking prophecies in history:
Boris Godunov called fortune-tellers to his place, and they predicted to him that he would reign for seven years.
The prophets predicted the imminent death of Ivan the Terrible, but he became angry and ordered them to remain silent, threatening to burn them all at the stake. The day before the predicted death, he ordered their execution, but did not see the execution, as he died suddenly.
At the feast of Ivan the Terrible, St. Basil poured out the table cup offered to him three times. When the tsar got angry with him, Vasily replied: “Don’t get angry, Ivanushka, it was necessary to douse the fire in Novgorod, and it was doused.” Later it turned out that, indeed, at that very time there was a dangerous fire in Novgorod.
A fortune teller predicted to A. Pushkin that he would die because of a beautiful woman.
American President Abraham Lincoln repeatedly had dreams and visions (the last time on the eve of the assassination attempt) that predicted his death at the hands of an assassin.
Philosophers and religious leaders believe that prophetic foresight is initiated by the Divine will. This is a wonderful revelation from God.
But scientists have the opposite opinion on this matter: “a miracle signals the imperfection of this world and its incompleteness; in this state of affairs, God must constantly complete it by interfering in the course of events. This does not fit with ideas about the harmony of the world.
In other words: man is his own prophet.
Currently, parapsychological scientists are working on creating a method of prophetic foresight, thanks to which it is possible to restore lost ability.
In the 21st century, people's faith in miracles and predictions is stronger than ever. Parapsychological centers and academies, schools of magic and occultism proliferated like mushrooms after the rain.
Charlatans offer to “foresee the future” by mail and by telephone, but this is absolutely impossible with superficial communication. They simply use people’s trust and belief in magic for their own selfish purposes, earning a lot of money from it.
You should not turn to gypsies and fortune tellers for predictions, because every person is able, from the height of his years and acquired experience, to “edit” his life, help himself find ways out of difficult situations, and support himself in difficult moments.
The main thing to remember is that the human consciousness is somewhat similar to the Internet, so it is worth protecting yourself with an anti-virus program with a firm “Do no harm” attitude against all sorts of pseudo healers and false prophets.
The original message is on the website
